Our main goal was to analyze government-led and grass-roots-led initiatives producing and managing data to empower citizens in Medellín and Bogotá. We analysed documents, conducted semi-structured interviews with dozens of officials and citizen group leaders, and carried out participatory research. Both projects had to do with approaches to public data: some ‘centralised’, government-led in the form of Smart City projects and others, more in the form of citizen-led initiatives. It is an exploration of grass-roots gardening initiatives in Cali, Bogotá and Medellín. The other, still ongoing, is called Communication Practices in the Medellín’s Gardeners Network.
It was an exploration of government-led, centralised Smart City projects in the cities of Bogotá and Medellín.
One, finished in 2017, was called City of Data. This chapter comes out of two separate research projects carried out in Colombia, South America. Data were obtained too thorough in-depth interviews, fieldwork and empirical observation.
#Social media photo privacy research pdf archive
The chapter employs Syrian Archive –an organization that curates and documents data related to the Syrian conflict for activism- as a pivotal case to look at the new standards applied to data gathering and verification in data activism from the South, as well as their challenges, so data become good enough to produce reliable evidence for social change.
It offers an unsentimental view on the failures and contradictions of data activism regarding the collection, analysis and communication of data (Hogan and Roberts 2015 Gutiérrez 2018 Palmer 2014 Vota 2012). The chapter derives from a taxonomy of activists based on how they go about obtaining data (Gutiérrez 2018a). The chapter examines how data are generated and employed in data activism, expanding and applying the term ‘good enough data’ beyond citizen sensing and the environment. Abstract: Drawing on the concept of ‘good enough data,’ which Gabrys, Pritchard and Barratt (Gabrys, Pritchard, and Barratt 2016) apply to citizen data collected via sensors this chapter looks critically at data in ‘proactive data activism,’ understood as a social practice that uses the data infrastructure politically and proactively to foster social change (Milan and Gutiérrez 2015).
0 kommentar(er)
